Re: [RFC?] Telling git about more complex relationships between commits (Was: Re: FFmpeg considering GIT)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 12:39:18PM +0100, Andy Parkins wrote:
> That way git-svn wouldn't (necessarily) need to keep its .rev_db file, and it 
> wouldn't need any special handling to allow the repository to be cloned.

Which, BTW, would be a great thing as on subversion repositories with
lots of revisions and lots of branches/tags, the disk space for all those
.rev_db files gets pretty bad.  i.e. du -sh .git/objects == 14M, du -sh
.git == 120M.

- Andy

-- 
Andrew Ruder <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.aeruder.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]