Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] stash: support pathspec argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/17, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> [some people may see this message twice, as I forgot to check if the
> copy I received had "Some A . Body" not enclosed in dq; blindly
> doing "Reply-All" ended up listing an invalid address on my Cc: line
> and dropped by vger. apologies]
> 
> > diff --git a/git-stash.sh b/git-stash.sh
> > index a184b1e274..1446fbe2e8 100755
> > --- a/git-stash.sh
> > +++ b/git-stash.sh
> > @@ -67,51 +67,20 @@ create_stash () {
> >  		case "$1" in
> >  		-m|--message)
> >  			shift
> > -			test -z ${1+x} && usage
> > -			stash_msg="$1"
> > -			new_style=t
> > +			stash_msg=${1-"BUG: create_stash () -m requires an argument"}
> >  			;;
> 
> Did you mean ${1?"BUG: ..."} here and also "-u" below?

Yeah, shell scripts are still confusing me sometimes.  Thanks for
catching.  Would you mind fixing this up while queuing or do you want
me to resend?

> >  		-u|--include-untracked)
> >  			shift
> > -			test -z ${1+x} && usage
> > -			untracked="$1"
> > -			new_style=t
> > +			untracked=${1-"BUG: create_stash () -u requires an argument"}
> >  			;;
> 
> Other than that the whole series looked sensible to me.
> 
> Thanks, will replace but that may not happen today.

Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]