On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:19:05PM -0600, Edmundo Carmona Antoranz wrote:
> I've been working on detecting revisions where a "real" deletion was
> made and I think I advanced a lot in that front. I still have to work
> on many scenarios (renamed files, for example... also performance) but
> at least I'm using a few runs against git-scm history and the results
> are "promising":
I played with this a bit more, and it did turn up the correct results
for some deletions in my experiments.
One thing I noticed is that it also turned up nonsense for lines that
blame in weird ways. For instance, I have a diff like this (these are
real examples, but don't pay attention to the sha1s; it's in a fork of
git, not upstream):
$ git diff v2.6.5 builtin/prune-packed.c
diff --git a/builtin/prune-packed.c b/builtin/prune-packed.c
index 7cf900ea07..5e3727e841 100644
--- a/builtin/prune-packed.c
+++ b/builtin/prune-packed.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#include "cache.h"
#include "progress.h"
#include "parse-options.h"
+#include "gh-log.h"
static const char * const prune_packed_usage[] = {
N_("git prune-packed [-n | --dry-run] [-q | --quiet]"),
@@ -29,8 +30,11 @@ static int prune_object(const unsigned char *sha1, const char *path,
if (*opts & PRUNE_PACKED_DRY_RUN)
printf("rm -f %s\n", path);
- else
+ else {
+ gh_logf("prune", "%s Duplicate loose object pruned\n",
+ sha1_to_hex(sha1));
unlink_or_warn(path);
+ }
return 0;
}
Running difflame on it says this:
$ python /path/to/difflame.py v2.6.5..HEAD -- builtin/prune-packed.c
[...]
-2c0b29e662 (Jeff King 2016-01-26 15:27:55 -0500 32) else
+d60032f8640 builtin/prune-packed.c (Jeff King 2015-02-02 23:15:33 -0500 33) else {
+d60032f8640 builtin/prune-packed.c (Jeff King 2015-02-02 23:15:33 -0500 34) gh_logf("prune", "%s Duplicate loose object pruned\n",
+d60032f8640 builtin/prune-packed.c (Jeff King 2015-02-02 23:15:33 -0500 35) sha1_to_hex(sha1));
0d3b729680e builtin/prune-packed.c (Jeff King 2014-10-15 18:40:53 -0400 36) unlink_or_warn(path);
+2396ec85bd1 prune-packed.c (Linus Torvalds 2005-07-03 14:27:34 -0700 37) }
There are two weird things. One is that the old "else" is attributed to
my 2c0b29e662. That's quite weird, because that is a merge commit which
did not touch the file at all. I haven't tracked it down, but presumably
that is weirdness with the --reverse blame.
But there's another one, that I think is easy to fix. The closing brace
is attributed to some ancient commit from Linus. Which yes, I'm sure had
a closing brace, but not _my_ closing brace that was added by
d60032f8640, that the rest of the lines got attributed to.
This isn't difflame's fault; that's what "git blame" tells you about
that line. But since I already told difflame "v2.6.5..HEAD", it would
probably make sense to similarly limit the blame to that range. That
turns up a boundary commit for the line. Which is _also_ not helpful,
but at least the tool is telling me that the line came from before
v2.6.5, and I don't really need to care much about it.
Part of this is that my use case may be a bit different than yours. I
don't actually want to look at the blame results directly. I just want
to see the set of commits that I'd need to look at and possibly
cherry-pick in order to re-create the diff.
-Peff