Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2017, #03; Fri, 10)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/02/2017 04:12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> writes:

Am 10.02.2017 um 23:24 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
* vn/xdiff-func-context (2017-01-15) 1 commit
 - xdiff -W: relax end-of-file function detection

 "git diff -W" has been taught to handle the case where a new
 function is added at the end of the file better.

 Will hold.
 Discussion on an follow-up change to go back from the line that
 matches the funcline to show comments before the function
 definition has not resulted in an actionable conclusion.

This one is a bug fix and can be merged already IMHO.

Absolutely.  I was just waiting if the follow-up discussion would
easily and quickly lead to another patch, forgot about what exactly
I was waiting for (i.e. the gravity of not having the follow-up),
and have left it in "Will hold" status forever.

I said I would resubmit the patches with more config options and more
command-line arguments (to avoid potentially breaking backwards
compatibility), but IIRC the response seemed to be "preceding blank line
heuristic is good enough" and "why bother", so I ended up not not
resubmitting anything.


Let's merge it to 'next' and then decide if we want to also merge it
to 'master' before the final.  The above step alone is a lot less
contriversial and tricky bugfix.

Thanks,


Vegard



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]