Re: fuzzy patch application

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:20:59AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>
>> I frequently need to backport patches from the Linux kernel to older
>> kernel versions (Android Security).  My usual workflow for simple
>> patches is:
>>
>> 1. try `git am patch.txt`.
>
> This is not exactly an answer to your question, but "git am -3" is often
> a better solution than trying to fuzz patches. It assumes the patches
> are Git patches (and record their origin blobs), and that you have that
> blob (which should be true if the patches are based on the normal kernel
> history, and you just fetch that history into your repository).
>
> I've found that this often manages to apply patches that "git apply"
> will not by itself. And I also find the resulting conflicts to be much
> easier to deal with than patch's ".rej" files.
>
> -Peff

I have been told this a couple of times before; do we want to make -3
the default (in 2.13 then) ?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]