Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2017, #02; Mon, 6)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 02/06/2017 11:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> [...]
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> [Stalled]
>> [...]
>> * mh/ref-remove-empty-directory (2017-01-07) 23 commits
>>  - files_transaction_commit(): clean up empty directories
>>  - try_remove_empty_parents(): teach to remove parents of reflogs, too
>>  - try_remove_empty_parents(): don't trash argument contents
>>  - try_remove_empty_parents(): rename parameter "name" -> "refname"
>>  - delete_ref_loose(): inline function
>>  - delete_ref_loose(): derive loose reference path from lock
>>  - log_ref_write_1(): inline function
>>  - log_ref_setup(): manage the name of the reflog file internally
>>  - log_ref_write_1(): don't depend on logfile argument
>>  - log_ref_setup(): pass the open file descriptor back to the caller
>>  - log_ref_setup(): improve robustness against races
>>  - log_ref_setup(): separate code for create vs non-create
>>  - log_ref_write(): inline function
>>  - rename_tmp_log(): improve error reporting
>>  - rename_tmp_log(): use raceproof_create_file()
>>  - lock_ref_sha1_basic(): use raceproof_create_file()
>>  - lock_ref_sha1_basic(): inline constant
>>  - raceproof_create_file(): new function
>>  - safe_create_leading_directories(): set errno on SCLD_EXISTS
>>  - safe_create_leading_directories_const(): preserve errno
>>  - t5505: use "for-each-ref" to test for the non-existence of references
>>  - refname_is_safe(): correct docstring
>>  - files_rename_ref(): tidy up whitespace
>> 
>>  Deletion of a branch "foo/bar" could remove .git/refs/heads/foo
>>  once there no longer is any other branch whose name begins with
>>  "foo/", but we didn't do so so far.  Now we do.
>> 
>>  Expecting a reroll.
>>  cf. <5051c78e-51f9-becd-e1a6-9c0b781d6912@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I think you missed v4 of this patch series [1], which is the re-roll
> that you were waiting for. And I missed that you missed it...
>
> Michael
>
> [1] http://public-inbox.org/git/cover.1483719289.git.mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx/

Actually it was worse than that.  What the above lists *is* v4; I
just failed to update "Expecting a reroll" note when I updated the
topic with your rerolled patches, and left it there trusting the
now-stale note of mine.

Sorry, and a HUGE thanks for noticing the mistake.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]