Re: [PATCH v3 00/27] Revamp the attribute system; another round

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> At least v3 gets the attribute system to a state where further
> improvements should be relatively easy to make.  And now as long as each
> thread has a unique attr_check structure, multiple callers can exist
> inside the attribute system at the same time.  There is still more work
> to be done on it though.  Still my biggest complaint is the "direction"
> aspect of the system.  I would love to also eliminate that as global
> state at some point though I'm not sure how at this point.

We are in agreement 100% ;-) The "direction" was the last thorn I
was fighting with (without successfully coming up with a usable
solution) when I stopped working on my original series before Stefan
took it over.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]