Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 02:34:08PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> * sk/parse-remote-cleanup (2017-02-06) 1 commit >> (merged to 'next' on 2017-02-06 at 6ec89f72d5) >> + parse-remote: remove reference to unused op_prep >> >> Code clean-up. >> >> Will merge to 'master'. > > Hrm. Are the functions in git-parse-remote.sh part of the public API? > That is, do we expect third-party scripts to do: > > . "$(git rev-parse --exec)/git-parse-remote.sh > error_on_missing_default_upstream "$a" "$b" "$c" "$d" > > ? If so, then they may be surprised by the change in function signature. > > I generally think of git-sh-setup as the one that external scripts would > use. There _is_ a manpage for git-parse-remote, but it doesn't list any > functions. So maybe they're all fair game for changing? > > I just didn't see any discussion of this in the original patch thread, > so I wanted to make sure we were making that decision consciously, and > not accidentally. :) Ummm, yes, I admit that this was accidental. I didn't really think of parse-remote as an externally visible and supported interface, but users have tendency to break our expectations, so, I dunno.