On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks. Even though the current code does not refer to the original
> prefixlen after the added hunk, I'd prefer not to destroy it to
> avoid future troubles, so I'll queue with a bit of tweak there,
> perhaps like the attached.
Yeah, I considered that. Along with just passing in a NULL prefix
string too for that case. Not that it matters.
So ack on that change,
Linus