On 5/2/07, Steven Grimm <koreth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In his reply to my script, Junio correctly pointed out that all this fiddling really ought to be happening in git-svn itself; it ought to know that you've done a merge and should record that fact directly in the metadata for 4' rather than treating it as a single-parent commit. If you do the above a zillion times you'll end up with a huge grafts file which is not so clean. But as a stopgap measure, this does work adequately.
Yes, it's seems just fine. Thanks for the tips. I'm not aware with the internal Git's features. As grafts seems to be a quick hack, is it posible to imagine that, after git-svn rewrited 4 in 4', an other tool rewrites (completly) the commit to produce a 4" with 2 parents? -- Guilhem BONNEFILLE -=- #UIN: 15146515 JID: guyou@xxxxxxxxxxxx MSN: guilhem_bonnefille@xxxxxxxxxxx -=- mailto:guilhem.bonnefille@xxxxxxxxx -=- http://nathguil.free.fr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html