On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 03:11 +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > How would discussion and review happen? People seem to use > either mail, or centralized messaging (and the latter often > involves non-Free systems like GitHub or Slack). It would depend on the setup for the particular repo. Information about where that happens could be part of the output of the git push. > This is a big one. Maybe CRM114 or another generic/trainable > option can be made usable; but I think there'll always be cases > where hardcoded rules need to be written (for SpamAssassin, > at least) and real-time blacklists need to be checked. TBH, I doubt spam would become a problem at all. > Anyways, I ultimately decided it would be better to continue > supporting and improving email (which is at least entrenched in > a few communities, like this one), rather than trying to get > people to adopt something new. Email is great for people used to the old ways but it is gradually being replaced by APIs and web interfaces :( -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part