Re: git/git-scm.com GH Issue Tracker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 12:49:34PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Of course, that will make it easier to let broken objects created by
> newer reimplementations of Git (and bugs in our code that cause us
> to create such broken objects) go unnoticed, so we would want to
> keep them at warn (not ignore) for the end-users.

Yes, sorry if that wasn't clear. By "loosen" I just meant to warn,
not ignore.

So a viable path forward is perhaps:

  1. Add fetch.fsck.* (and probably transfer.fsck.*) to match the
     receive-pack options.

  2. Go over the current list of default warning/error settings and make
     sure they are sensible.

  3. Add a "light" mode to transfer.fsckObjects and friends that blocks
     only errors, not warnings. Maybe setting the config bool to
     "errors-only" instead of "true" or something.

  4. (Optional) Default transfer.fsckObjects to "errors-only".

     The escape hatch is to set fsckObjects to "false", or to downgrade
     your specific problem to a warning via transfer.fsck.*.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]