Re: [PATCH v2] parse-remote: Remove reference to unused op_prep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey SIddharth,

> Subject: parse-remote: Remove reference to unused op_prep
                                         ^

Minor nit: after the colon, we generally don't use the word starting
with an uppercase letter which I think can be figured out when you run
`git log -p git-parse-remote.sh`

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Siddharth Kannan
<kannan.siddharth12@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The error_on_missing_default_upstream helper function learned to
> take op_prep argument with 15a147e618 ("rebase: use @{upstream}
> if no upstream specified", 2011-02-09), but as of 045fac5845
> ("i18n: git-parse-remote.sh: mark strings for translation",
>  2016-04-19), the argument is no longer used.  Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Kannan <kannan.siddharth12@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Thanks a lot, Pranit and Junio for your reviews on the first version of this
> patch. I have changed the messages accordingly.
>
>  contrib/examples/git-pull.sh | 2 +-
>  git-parse-remote.sh          | 3 +--
>  git-rebase.sh                | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/contrib/examples/git-pull.sh b/contrib/examples/git-pull.sh
> index 6b3a03f..1d51dc3 100755
> --- a/contrib/examples/git-pull.sh
> +++ b/contrib/examples/git-pull.sh
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ error_on_no_merge_candidates () {
>                 echo "for your current branch, you must specify a branch on the command line."
>         elif [ -z "$curr_branch" -o -z "$upstream" ]; then
>                 . git-parse-remote
> -               error_on_missing_default_upstream "pull" $op_type $op_prep \
> +               error_on_missing_default_upstream "pull" $op_type \
>                         "git pull <remote> <branch>"
>         else
>                 echo "Your configuration specifies to $op_type $op_prep the ref '${upstream#refs/heads/}'"

I guess I suggested you to not change the file in contrib/ in my
earlier email[1] and to which Junio agreed too[2]. Is there any
confusion?

> diff --git a/git-parse-remote.sh b/git-parse-remote.sh
> index d3c3998..9698a05 100644
> --- a/git-parse-remote.sh
> +++ b/git-parse-remote.sh
> @@ -56,8 +56,7 @@ get_remote_merge_branch () {
>  error_on_missing_default_upstream () {
>         cmd="$1"
>         op_type="$2"
> -       op_prep="$3" # FIXME: op_prep is no longer used
> -       example="$4"
> +       example="$3"
>         branch_name=$(git symbolic-ref -q HEAD)
>         display_branch_name="${branch_name#refs/heads/}"
>         # If there's only one remote, use that in the suggestion
> diff --git a/git-rebase.sh b/git-rebase.sh
> index 04f6e44..b89f960 100755
> --- a/git-rebase.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase.sh
> @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ then
>                 then
>                         . git-parse-remote
>                         error_on_missing_default_upstream "rebase" "rebase" \
> -                               "against" "git rebase $(gettext '<branch>')"
> +                               "git rebase $(gettext '<branch>')"
>                 fi
>
>                 test "$fork_point" = auto && fork_point=t
> --
> 2.1.4
>

[1]: http://public-inbox.org/git/CAFZEwPMGTzVuLMSzm8wiNxvia4AV0T79C1ZTfcuO4=Bydz_zQA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[2]: http://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqd1ey8rul.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]