Re: octopus merge --no-ff claims to fast-forward even though it doesn't

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Samuel Lijin <sxlijin@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I was doing an octopus merge earlier and noticed that it claims to
> fast-forward when you specify --no-ff, even though it does actually
> abide by --no-ff.

This was intentional and hasn't changed since it was first designed;
the octopus was to be used only for the simple and obvious merges.

If anything, I think it should error out when the --no-ff option is
given, issuing the same error message as the one given when any step
other than the last one needs manual resolution.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]