Re: [StGIT RFC PATCH] Don't use refs/bases/<branchname>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/2/07, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It's not near the top of my kill list by any stretch of the
imagination, so no need to worry. And even if it were, Catalin would
certainly stand as a wall of sanity between qgit and my chain saw. :-)


Currently I check for the existence of <git dir>/patches directory as
a quick exit in case a repository does NOT have a StGIT repo on it
(the common case).

This avoids a costly and 99% of cases not needed 'stg <something>' call.

I ask if it will be still a safe check in the long period or it is
better to change the check to something else (as existence of <git
dir>/refs/patches) instead ?

Thanks
Marco
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]