Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I guess the way to dig would be to add a test that looks at the output > of "type mv" or something, push it to a Travis-hooked branch, and then > wait for the output Sounds tempting ;-)
Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I guess the way to dig would be to add a test that looks at the output > of "type mv" or something, push it to a Travis-hooked branch, and then > wait for the output Sounds tempting ;-)