On 01/25/2017 07:00 PM, Jeff King wrote: > - Is that the end of it, or is the desire really "I want reflogs for > _everything_"? That seems like a sane thing to want. > > If so, then the update to core.logallrefupdates should turn it into > a tri-state: > > - false; no reflogs > > - true; reflogs for branches, remotes, notes, as now > > - always; reflogs for all refs under "refs/" > I think you nailed it. This is much more useful than what I suggested. I'll see if I can code it up.