Re: [PATCH 7/7] completion: recognize more long-options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/25/2017 12:24 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Cornelius Weig <cornelius.weig@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>>> Please study item (5) "Sign your work" in
>>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches and sign off your work.
>>
>> I followed the recommendations to submitting work, and in the first
>> round signing is discouraged.
> 
> Just this point.  You found a bug in our documentation if that is
> the case; it should not be giving that impression to you.  
> 

Well, I am referring to par. (4) of Documentation/SubmittingPatches
(emphasis mine):

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
*Do not PGP sign your patch, at least for now*.  Most likely, your
maintainer or other people on the list would not have your PGP
key and would not bother obtaining it anyway.  Your patch is not
judged by who you are; a good patch from an unknown origin has a
far better chance of being accepted than a patch from a known,
respected origin that is done poorly or does incorrect things.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

If first submissions should be signed as well, then I find this quite
misleading.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]