Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Should we plan to extend this to the interactive backend that is >> shared between rebase -i and rebase -m, too? Or is this patch >> already sufficient to cover them? > > AFAIK this is sufficient for both, in the sense that I've used it with > git rebase -i and it works. That is a good news and at the same time a bit awkard one ;-) The mention of "passed to 'git am'" twice in the documentation and help text would lead people to think "rebase -i" would not be affected and (1) would need more work to do so, or (2) the user does not want "rebase -i" to be unaffected for whatever reason, and gets surprised to see that it actually does get affected. In any case, will queue as-is so that we won't lose the patch while waiting for people to raise their opinions. Thanks.