Re: [PATCH] mingw: follow-up to "replace isatty() hack"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>>> -	dup2(new_fd, fd);
>>>  	if (console == handle)
>>>  		console = duplicate;
>>> -	handle = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
>>> +	dup2(new_fd, fd);
>>>
>>>  	/* Close the temp fd.  This explicitly closes "new_handle"
>>>  	 * (because it has been associated with it).
>>>
>
> Looks good and obviously correct (FLW). I can offer a
>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx>
>
> but it will take a day or two until I can test the patch.

I think a Reviewed-by is good enough, as the original

<2ce6060b891f8313cc63a95a9cba9064b7f82eb8.1482448531.git.johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>

already has "Tested-by" to indicate that as a whole this have been
tested.  The "follow-up" we are commenting on was made out of that
original to incrementally update the older version that was queued
and merged to 'master' 3 weeks ago.

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]