Re: [PATCH 2/2] Be more careful when determining whether a remote was configured

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peff,

On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Jeff King wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:19:24PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > One of the really nice features of the ~/.gitconfig file is that users
> > can override defaults by their own preferred settings for all of their
> > repositories.
> > 
> > One such default that some users like to override is whether the
> > "origin" remote gets auto-pruned or not. The user would simply call
> > 
> > 	git config --global remote.origin.prune true
> > 
> > and from now on all "origin" remotes would be pruned automatically when
> > fetching into the local repository.
> > 
> > There is just one catch: now Git thinks that the "origin" remote is
> > configured, as it does not discern between having a remote whose
> > fetch (and/or push) URL and refspec is set, and merely having
> > preemptively-configured, global flags for specific remotes.
> > 
> > Let's fix this by telling Git that a remote is not configured unless any
> > fetch/push URL or refspect is configured explicitly.
> 
> Hmm. Old versions of GitHub for Windows used to set fetch refspecs in
> the system gitconfig, for a similar purpose to what you want to do with
> remote.origin.prune.
> 
> I notice here that setting a refspec _does_ define a remote. Is there a
> reason you drew the line there, and not at, say, whether it has a URL?

I want to err on the side of caution. That's why.

Ciao,
Johannes



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]