Re: [RFC] stash: support filename argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC] stash: support filename argument
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:51:20 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx>, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kes-kes@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <xmqqvatfc0rt.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
References: <20170115142542.11999-1-t.gummerer@gmail.com> <xmqqvatfc0rt.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
User-agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)

Hi Junio,

On Sun, 15 Jan 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> I haven't spent enough time to think if it even makes sense to
> "stash" partially, leaving the working tree still dirty.

Think no more! We already support that with --keep-index, and it is a very
useful feature.

Ciao,
Johannes

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] stash: support filename argument
  - From: Johannes Schindelin

References:
- [RFC] stash: support filename argument
  - From: Thomas Gummerer
- Re: [RFC] stash: support filename argument
  - From: Junio C Hamano

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 00/38] Teach the sequencer to act as rebase -i's backend
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] stash --continue
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] stash: support filename argument
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] stash: support filename argument
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]