Pat Pannuto <pat.pannuto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You may still want the 1/2 patch in this series, just to make things > internally consistent with "-w" vs "use warnings;" inside git's perl > scripts. No, that is a step back. "-w" affects the entire process, so it spots more potential problems. The "warnings" pragma is scoped to the enclosing block, so it won't span across files. Existing instances of "use warnings" should remain, but I would rather support adding "-w" to scripts which do not have it (and fixing newly-found warnings along the way). Thanks.