Re: [PATCH v1] convert: add "status=delayed" to filter process protocol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narębski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Yes, this problem happens every day with filters that perform network
>> requests (e.g. GitLFS). 
>
> Do I understand it correctly that the expected performance improvement
> thanks to this feature is possible only if there is some amount of
> parallelism and concurrency in the filter?  That is, filter can be sending
> one blob to Git while processing other one, or filter can be fetching blobs
> in parallel.

The first-object latency may not be helped, but by allowing
"delayed", the latency to retrieve the second and subsequent objects
can be hidden, I would think.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]