On 2017-01-06 04:42, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Am 06.01.2017 um 02:09 schrieb Richard Hansen:If rerere is enabled and no pathnames are given, run cd_to_toplevel before running 'git diff --name-only' so that 'git diff --name-only' sees the pathnames emitted by 'git rerere remaining'. Also run cd_to_toplevel before running 'git rerere remaining' in case 'git rerere remaining' is ever changed to print pathnames relative to the current directory rather than to $GIT_WORK_TREE. This fixes a regression introduced in 57937f70a09c12ef484c290865dac4066d207c9c (v2.11.0). Signed-off-by: Richard Hansen <hansenr@xxxxxxxxxx> --- git-mergetool.sh | 1 + t/t7610-mergetool.sh | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/git-mergetool.sh b/git-mergetool.sh index e52b4e4f2..67ea0d6db 100755 --- a/git-mergetool.sh +++ b/git-mergetool.sh @@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ main () { if test $# -eq 0 && test -e "$GIT_DIR/MERGE_RR" then + cd_to_toplevel set -- $(git rerere remaining) if test $# -eq 0 thenThis cannot be a complete solution. Why do we have another cd_to_toplevel later, after `git diff --name-only -- "$@"`?
The arguments passed to 'git diff' (including the -O argument) are all interpreted as relative to the current working directory, yet 'git diff --name-only' outputs pathnames that are relative to the top-level directory. Thus:
* cd_to_toplevel MUST NOT be run before that 'git diff' command unless all pathnames relative to $PWD are converted to absolute (or relative to the top-level directory), and * cd_to_toplevel MUST be run after 'git diff' so that $files is interpreted correctly.And now I realize that my change breaks -O<foo> if <foo> is relative to $PWD. Grr. Too bad we don't have tests for running mergetool -O<relative-path> from a subdirectory.
Maybe it is necessary to revert back to the flow control that we had before 57937f70a09c ("mergetool: honor diff.orderFile", 2016-10-07)? It did not have `test $# -eq 0` and `test -e "$GIT_DIR/MERGE_RR"` in a single condition.
Reverting to the previous control flow won't work unless the -O pathname is converted to absolute (or relative to the top-level directory). But I'll have to do that anyway. Blech.
Do we already have a helper shell function somewhere that converts a pathname to absolute? Thanks to symlinks it's trickier than one might expect.
Thanks, Richard
-- Hannes
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>