Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] road to reentrant real_path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04.01.17 01:48, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 11:09:18AM -0800, Brandon Williams wrote:
> 
>> Only change with v4 is in [1/5] renaming the #define MAXSYMLINKS back to
>> MAXDEPTH due to a naming conflict brought up by Lars Schneider.
> 
> Hmm. Isn't MAXSYMLINKS basically what you want here, though? It what's
> what all other similar functions will be using.
> 
> The only problem was that we were redefining the macro. So maybe:
> 
>   #ifndef MAXSYMLINKS
>   #define MAXSYMLINKS 5
>   #endif
> 
> would be a good solution?
Why 5  ? (looking at the  20..30 below)
And why 5 on one system and e.g. on my Mac OS
#define MAXSYMLINKS     32  

Would the same value value for all Git installations on all platforms make sense?
#define GITMAXSYMLINKS 20

> 
> It looks like the "usual" value is more like 20 or 30 on most systems,
> though.  We should probably also set errno to ELOOP when we hit the
> limit, which is what other symlink-resolving functions would do.
> 
> I'm surprised we didn't hit this on Linux, which has MAXSYMLINKS, too.
> We should be picking it up from <sys/param.h>.
> 
> -Peff
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]