On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 04:12:40AM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote: > This is a re-roll of an old patch series. v1 [1] got some feedback, > which I think was all addressed in v2 [2]. But it seems that v2 fell > on the floor, and I didn't bother following up because it was in the > same area of code that was undergoing heavy changes due to the > pluggable reference backend work. Sorry for the long delay before > getting back to it. I've read through the whole thing, and aside from a few very minor nits (that I am not even sure are worth a re-roll), I didn't see anything wrong. And the overall goal and approach seem obviously sound. > Michael Haggerty (23): I'll admit to being daunted by the number of patches, but it was quite a pleasant and easy read. Thanks. -Peff