Hi Junio, On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > The scripted version of the interactive rebase already does that. > > Sensible. I was wondering why this wasn't there while reviewing > 10/34, comparing the two (this is not a suggestion to squash this > into the previous step). It's a bit of a historical wart, as I discovered test breakages only long after implementing the fixup/squash commands (as you may have guessed, I implemented the commands one after another, fixing things as discovered by the test suite; it took something like a month until I got the rebase--helper based rebase -i to pass t3404). In the end, I decided not to squash this into 10/34 because it seemed to be a significant enough change to merit its own commit. Ciao, Dscho