Re: [PATCH] real_path: make real_path thread-safe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/07, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > But in any case it seems that e.g.
> > //SEFVER/SHARE/DIR1/DIR2/..
> > must be converted into
> > //SEFVER/SHARE/DIR1
> >
> > and 
> > \\SEFVER\SHARE\DIR1\DIR2\..
> > must be converted into
> > \\SEFVER\SHARE\DIR1
> 
> Additional questions that may be interesting are:
> 
>     //A/B/../C		is it //A/C?  is it an error?
>     //A/B/../../C/D	is it //C/D?  is it an error?
> 


Also is //.. the same as //?  I would assume so since /.. is /

-- 
Brandon Williams



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]