Re: [PATCH 1/3] wt-status: implement opportunisitc index update correctly

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So I would expect that we'd rather fix the update_index_if_able instead by
> checking for the lockfile to be in the correct state?

I actually don't expect that, after looking at other call sites of
that function.