On 12/05, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > static const char *real_path_internal(const char *path, int die_on_error)
> > {
> > - static struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> > + static struct strbuf resolved = STRBUF_INIT;
>
> Also by having this static here, it is not quite thread safe, yet.
>
> By removing the static here we cannot do the early cheap check as:
>
> > /* We've already done it */
> > - if (path == sb.buf)
> > + if (path == resolved.buf)
> > return path;
>
> I wonder how often we run into this case; are there some callers explicitly
> relying on real_path_internal being cheap for repeated calls?
> (Maybe run the test suite with this early return instrumented? Not sure how
> to assess the impact of removing the cheap out return optimization)
>
> The long tail (i.e. the actual functionality) should actually be
> faster, I'd imagine
> as we do less than with using chdir.
Depends on how expensive the chdir calls were. And I'm working to get
rid of the static buffer. Just need have the callers own the memory
first.
--
Brandon Williams