Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 12/01, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > I started taking a look at your http redirect series (I really should >> > have taking a look at it sooner) and I see exactly what you're talking >> > about. We can easily move this logic into a function to make it easier >> > to generate the two whitelists. >> >> OK. With both of them queued, t5812 seems to barf, just FYI; I'll >> expect that a future reroll would make things better. > > Yeah I expected we would see an issue since both these series collide in > http.c > > I'm sending out another reroll of this series so that in Jeff's he can > just call 'get_curl_allowed_protocols(-1)' for the non-redirection curl > option, which should make this test stop barfing. I was hoping to eventually merge Peff's series to older maintenance tracks. How bad would it be if we rebased the v8 of this series together with Peff's series to say v2.9 (or even older if it does not look too bad)?