Re: [PATCH] Convert t6022 to use git-merge instead of git-pull

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert t6022 to use git-merge instead of git-pull
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:15:03 -0700
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070425200718.GB30061@xxxxxxxxxx> (Alex Riesen's message of "Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:07:18 +0200")
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Is this really necessary?

I would rather want to leave some tests use "git merge" while
some others use "git pull ." to catch breakage of either form.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Convert t6022 to use git-merge instead of git-pull
  - From: Andy Whitcroft
- Re: [PATCH] Convert t6022 to use git-merge instead of git-pull
  - From: Alex Riesen

References:
- [PATCH] Convert t6022 to use git-merge instead of git-pull
  - From: Alex Riesen

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] git-svn: Don't rely on $_ after making a function call
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix handle leak in write_tree
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Convert t6022 to use git-merge instead of git-pull
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Convert t6022 to use git-merge instead of git-pull
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]