RE: [PATCH 02/16] submodule: modernize ok_to_remove_submodule to use argv_array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: RE: [PATCH 02/16] submodule: modernize ok_to_remove_submodule to use argv_array
From: David Turner <David.Turner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 23:11:15 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx" <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gitster@xxxxxxxxx" <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>, "jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx" <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx>, "mogulguy10@xxxxxxxxx" <mogulguy10@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20161115230651.23953-3-sbeller@google.com>
References: <20161115230651.23953-1-sbeller@google.com> <20161115230651.23953-3-sbeller@google.com>
Thread-index: AQHSP5T4bfL7FTmdgkO5LEiTqvYB6qDaq2aQ
Thread-topic: [PATCH 02/16] submodule: modernize ok_to_remove_submodule to use argv_array

> -		"-u",
...
> +	argv_array_pushl(&cp.args, "status", "--porcelain", "-uall",

This also changes -u to -uall, which is not mentioned in the commit message.  That should probably be called out.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 02/16] submodule: modernize ok_to_remove_submodule to use argv_array
  - From: Junio C Hamano

References:
- [RFC PATCH 00/16] Checkout aware of Submodules!
  - From: Stefan Beller
- [PATCH 02/16] submodule: modernize ok_to_remove_submodule to use argv_array
  - From: Stefan Beller

Prev by Date: [PATCH 13/16] submodule: teach unpack_trees() to update submodules
Next by Date: [PATCH 16/16] checkout: add config option to recurse into submodules by default
Previous by thread: [PATCH 02/16] submodule: modernize ok_to_remove_submodule to use argv_array
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/16] submodule: modernize ok_to_remove_submodule to use argv_array
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]