Re: [PATCH 1/2] push: --dry-run updates submodules when --recurse-submodules=on-demand

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] push: --dry-run updates submodules when --recurse-submodules=on-demand
From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:46:04 +0100
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20161115172909.GA66382@google.com>
References: <1479172735-698-1-git-send-email-bmwill@google.com> <1479172735-698-2-git-send-email-bmwill@google.com> <4a72ad14-0a8f-ede9-9f54-601fcd37740b@kdbg.org> <20161115172909.GA66382@google.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0

Am 15.11.2016 um 18:29 schrieb Brandon Williams:

I'm assuming the reason we want to avoid sub-shells is
for performance reasons right?


Yes, every fork() saved is a win on Windows. (No pun intended ;)

-- Hannes

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] bug fix with push --dry-run and submodules
  - From: Brandon Williams
- [PATCH 1/2] push: --dry-run updates submodules when --recurse-submodules=on-demand
  - From: Brandon Williams
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] push: --dry-run updates submodules when --recurse-submodules=on-demand
  - From: Johannes Sixt
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] push: --dry-run updates submodules when --recurse-submodules=on-demand
  - From: Brandon Williams

Prev by Date: Re: ignore blank line removals
Next by Date: Re: Protecting old temporary objects being reused from concurrent "git gc"?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] push: --dry-run updates submodules when --recurse-submodules=on-demand
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] push: fix --dry-run to not push submodules
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]