Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] git diff <(command1) <(command2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, Jacob Keller wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >> No tests or documentation updates yet, and I'm not sure whether
> >> --follow-symlinks in other modes than --no-index should be supported, ignored
> >> (as it is now) or cause an error, but I'm leaning towards the third option.
> >
> > My knee-jerk reaction is:
> >
> >  * The --no-index mode should default to your --follow-symlinks
> >    behaviour, without any option to turn it on or off.
> >
> 
> I agree. We shouldn't have to specify this for no-index.

Ummm. *My* idea of --no-index was for it to behave as similar to the
--index version as possible. For example when comparing directories
containing symlinks. You seem intent on breaking this scenario.

Ciao,
Johannes



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]