On 10 Nov 2016, at 22:34, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> I've followed what was available at the public-inbox archive, but it >>> is unclear what the conclusion was. >>> >>> For the first one your "how about" non-patch, to which Peff said >>> "that's simple and good", looked good to me as well, but is it >>> available as a final patch that I can just take and apply (otherwise >>> I think I can do the munging myself, but I'd rather be spoon-fed >>> when able ;-). >> >> Sure! Here you go: >> http://public-inbox.org/git/20161110111348.61580-1-larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx/ >> >> >>> I do not have a strong opinion on the second one. For an interim >>> solution, disabling webserver tests certainly is expedite and safe, >>> so I am fine taking it as-is, but I may have missed strong >>> objections. >> >> I haven't seen strong objections either. Just for reference, here is the patch: >> http://public-inbox.org/git/20161017002550.88782-3-larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Thanks. Picked up both of them. Thanks! This makes "next" pass, again: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/builds/174946111 BTW: If you want to learn about the build status of "git/git" branches on the command line then you can use this snippet: $ branch=next; echo "$branch: $(curl -s https://api.travis-ci.org/repos/git/git/branches/$branch | perl -lape 's/.*"state":"(\w+)".*"sha":"(\w{7}).*/$1 $2/g')" Cheers, Lars