Re: send-email garbled header with trailing doublequote in email

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3 November 2016 at 15:18, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:29:01PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
>> So this must be postfix then that out of the blue decided to garble it
>> in a strange way while parsing the input... The removal of all
>> whitespaces s/what ever/whatever/ especially I've no idea how it
>> decided to do so.
>>
>> Can you reproduce with postfix as sendmail at least? If you can
>> reproduce also see what happens if you add another --to.
>
> Yes, I can easily reproduce without using git at all by installing
> postfix in local-delivery mode and running:
>
> sendmail peff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <<\EOF
> From: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "what ever" " <peff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: patch
>
> This is the body
> EOF
>
> Many MTAs do this kind of header-rewriting. I don't necessarily agree
> with it as a general concept, but the real problem is the syntactically
> bogus header. The munging that postfix does makes things worse, but I
> can see why it is confused and does what it does (the whole email is
> inside a double-quoted portion that is never closed, so it probably
> thinks there is no hostname portion at all).
>
> So git is possibly at fault for passing along a bogus address. OTOH, the
> user is perhaps at fault for providing the bogus address to git in the
> first place. GIGO. :)
>
> I think if any change were to be made, it would be to recognize this
> bogosity and either clean it up or abort. That ideally would happen via
> Mail::Address so git does not have to add a bunch of ad-hoc "is this
> valid rfc822" checks. Reading the manpage for that module, though, it
> says:
>
>   [we do not handle all of rfc2822]
>   Often requests are made to the maintainers of this code improve this
>   situation, but this is not a good idea, where it will break zillions
>   of existing applications.  If you wish for a fully RFC2822 compliant
>   implementation you may take a look at Mail::Message::Field::Full, part
>   of MailBox.
>
> So it's possible that switching to a more robust module would improve
> things.

There is an RFC2822 compliant email address validator in the perl test
suite if you guys want to use it.  We use it to test recursive
patterns.

http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/blob/HEAD:/t/re/reg_email.t

Yves


-- 
perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]