Re: [PATCH v1 05/19] update-index: warn in case of split-index incoherency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>>> Wrap this string and the one below with _() so they can be translated.
>>
>> True.
>>
>> I further wonder if a natural reaction from users after seeing this
>> message is "I do want to--what else would I use that option to run
>> you for?  Just do as you are told, instead of telling me what to
>> do!".  Is this warning really a good idea, or shouldn't these places
>> be setting the configuration?
>
> In 435ec090ec (config: add core.untrackedCache, 2016-01-27) we decided
> to just use warning() after discussing if we should instead set the
> configuration.

Yeah that seems to be the version that was committed.  I then wonder
if the users would naturally have a similar raction to that warning
as well.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]