Re: [PATCH v1 05/19] update-index: warn in case of split-index incoherency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Christian Couder
> <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> When users are using `git update-index --(no-)split-index`, they
>> may expect the split-index feature to be used or not according to
>> the option they just used, but this might not be the case if the
>> new "core.splitIndex" config variable has been set. In this case
>> let's warn about what will happen and why.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  builtin/update-index.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/builtin/update-index.c b/builtin/update-index.c
>> index b75ea03..a14dbf2 100644
>> --- a/builtin/update-index.c
>> +++ b/builtin/update-index.c
>> @@ -1098,12 +1098,21 @@ int cmd_update_index(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>>         }
>>
>>         if (split_index > 0) {
>> +               if (git_config_get_split_index() == 0)
>> +                       warning("core.splitIndex is set to false; "
>> +                               "remove or change it, if you really want to "
>> +                               "enable split index");
>
> Wrap this string and the one below with _() so they can be translated.

Ok, it will be in the next version.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]