Re: [PATCH] compat: Allow static initializer for pthreads on Windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>> As many codepaths may not even need access to the attributes, I
>> doubt that would be a very productive direction to go.
>
> So, what is productive then? Pessimizing one (not exactly minor) platform?

Lazy on-demand initialization as needed, perhaps?  The on-demand
initialization mechanism may become no-op on some platforms that can
do static initialization.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]