On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > As with any "tracking" list, wanting to have one and starting is the > > easy part. Unless kept up to date, such a list becomes quickly useless, > > or even worse than not having one, leading to wasted wild goose chase if > > people look at it without knowing how stale it is. > > I used to issue `git log -p todo -- TODO` quite a lot; thank you! > > And I miss kernel and git cousins, too... Why not have the TODO list in the source branches, listing features that ought to be in that version but aren't? That way, people can submit feature requests as patches that add to the todo list (and the requested feature can be discussed in response), and patches that implement features can simultaneously remove them from the todo list. Anyone considering working on adding desired features would need an up-to-date repository anyway. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank* - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html