Re: [PATCH 1/2] t9000-addresses: update expected results after fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 21/10/16 17:48, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> e3fdbcc8e1 (parse_mailboxes: accept extra text after <...> address,
>> 2016-10-13) improved our in-house address parser and made it closer to
>> Mail::Address. As a consequence, some tests comparing it to
>> Mail::Address now pass, but e3fdbcc8e1 forgot to update the test.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
> 
> Thanks.

Yep, thanks for looking into this Matthieu.

I applied these cleanly (to both next and pu) and tested
on Linux and cygwin.

Thanks again.

ATB,
Ramsay Jones





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]