Re: [PATCH v4 20/25] sequencer: refactor write_message()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

>> Ah, make that four steps.  The final one is:
>> 
>>     - add append_eol parameter that nobody uses at this step in the
>>       series.
>>
>> This is a new feature to the helper.  While it is OK to have it as a
>> preparatory step in this series, it is easier to understand if it
>> kept as a separate step.  It is even more preferrable if it is made
>> as a preparatory step in a series that adds a caller that passes
>> true to append_eol to this helper...
>
> Done,
> Dscho

Hmm, what has been done exactly?  I still see append_eol in v5 where
nobody uses it yet.  Confused...




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]