Re: [PATCH] Fix handle leak in write_tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Alex Riesen" <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ... Isn't such kind of resource control _generally_ nicer to implement
> in the top levels of a program?

In theory perhaps, but my understanding of our use of atexit()
is to clean them up in situations beyond the control of the top
levels of a program, most notably upon exit on signal.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]