Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Where at the end-user facing level does this trailing "/." surface >> and how does the difference appear to them? I think that is the >> crucial question. >> >> Unless there is some convincing argument why "." is not special >> (i.e. counter-argument to the above "bus vs sub" and ". vs sub" >> example), I would think "existing users with /." does not matter. >> If they are "relying" on the behaviour, I would think it is not >> because they find that behaviour intuitive, but only because they >> learned to live with it. IOW, treating all of A/B/C the same way >> would appear to them a strict bugfix, I would think. > > I see, so we should adapt the windows style and chop off '/.' > to make A,B,C all the same, because internally we never produced > C AFAICT. > > These came in via hand edited .gitmodules files. Can you elaborate a bit more on this? Without seeing "The user added X/. instead of the usual X because s/he wanted to see Y happen. If s/he had X there, Z would have happened instead of Y" and why being able to expect Y to happen is a good thing (compared to Z), we may fail to notice why the more "intuitive" (at least to me) "these three must result in the same outcome: path/to/dir, path/to/dir/, or path/to/dir/." does not serve a legitimate use case.