Re: Uninitialized submodules as symlinks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Daudt <me@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 06:10:17PM +0200, Heiko Voigt wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:17:05PM +0000, David Turner wrote:
>> > Presently, uninitialized submodules are materialized in the working
>> > tree as empty directories.  We would like to consider having them be
>> > symlinks.  Specifically, we'd like them to be symlinks into a FUSE
>> > filesystem which retrieves files on demand.
>> 
>> How about portability? This feature would only work on Unix like
>> operating systems. You have to be careful to not break Windows since
>> they do not have symlinks.
>
> NTFS does have symlinks, but you need admin right to create them though
> (unless you change the policy).

That sounds like saying "It has, but it practically is not usable by
Git as a mechanism to achieve this goal" to me.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]