Re: [RFH] plumber's puzzle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds wrote:

On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I should be happy that I figured out what is going on, but I am
not very happy with this patch.

That actually looks like the right patch.

The "fflush() before fork()" thing is a real issue, and a real bug. Stdio is buffered, and yes, fork() will duplicate the buffer if not flushed.

Of course, I'm not 100% sure that is the right _place_ for the fflush() call. I wonder if we should just do the fflush() closer to the place that generates the data. As it is, we may have other things like that lurking.

Of course, delaying the fflush as long as possible is likely good for performance, so doing it just before the fork() (even if it may be ugly and somewhat unexpected at that point to have to do it) may just be the right thing regardless...


It might be worthwhile to have a wrapper function for fork() which adds fflush(NULL); before forking?

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]