Re: Bug with git merge-base and a packed ref

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Bug with git merge-base and a packed ref
From: Stepan Kasal <kasal@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:33:36 +0200
Cc: John Keeping <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20161012163209.oadmm7xsmm7oeumr@sigill.intra.peff.net>
References: <20161012103716.GA31533@ucw.cz> <20161012163209.oadmm7xsmm7oeumr@sigill.intra.peff.net>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

Hello,

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:32:09PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> The --fork-point option looks in the reflog [...]
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:37:16PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> > Could you please fix merge-base so that it understands packed refs?

I bet you nailed it; nothing with packed refs.
Thanks for correcting me.

Stepan

References:
- Bug with git merge-base and a packed ref
  - From: Stepan Kasal
- Re: Bug with git merge-base and a packed ref
  - From: Jeff King

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] worktree: allow the main brach of a bare repository to be checked out
Next by Date: Re: [PATCHv2] attr: convert to new threadsafe API
Previous by thread: Re: Bug with git merge-base and a packed ref
Next by thread: [PATCH] merge-base: handle --fork-point without reflog
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]