Re: interactive rebase should better highlight the not-applying commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: interactive rebase should better highlight the not-applying commit
From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:55:22 -0700
Cc: "git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20161011190745.w2asu6eoromkrccu@droplet>
References: <20161011190745.w2asu6eoromkrccu@droplet>

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Joshua N Pritikin <jpritikin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I assume somebody familiar with GIT's code base could make this change
> in about 10 minutes.

Can you elaborate how you come to that estimate?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: interactive rebase should better highlight the not-applying commit
  - From: Johannes Schindelin

References:
- interactive rebase should better highlight the not-applying commit
  - From: Joshua N Pritikin

Prev by Date: Re: Make `git fetch --all` parallel?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] reset: support the --stdin option
Previous by thread: interactive rebase should better highlight the not-applying commit
Next by thread: Re: interactive rebase should better highlight the not-applying commit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]